This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Integrating Controls for Hydrogen Production

Author : David Crump, Opto 22

23 February 2010

With control products from five different vendors in use at its virtual power plant, Sotavento relied on programmable automation controllers to connect analogue and digital I/O across its enterprise.

A description of the equipment used to produce and store hydrogen and deliver power at the Sotavento virtual power plant in Spain.
A description of the equipment used to produce and store hydrogen and deliver power at the Sotavento virtual power plant in Spain.

With control products from five different vendors in use at its virtual power plant, Sotavento relied on programmable automation controllers to connect analogue and digital I/O across its enterprise.

Hydrogen has long been discussed as a high potential alternative energy source, but most discussions of it focus on its use in automobiles. As such, the discussion quickly gets bogged down in two areas: infrastructure issues (replacing the current gasoline delivery pipeline) and the energy inputs required to produce hydrogen for fuel.

But there are multiple other uses for hydrogen as a fuel source, from powering buildings to electronics and equipment, and it can be created using the energy from alternative energy sources, not just fossil fuels. Hydrogen’s important environmental advantage—when burned, hydrogen produces no contaminating emissions—has led to a growing interest in designing processes that use stored hydrogen as an energy source. Moreover, in cases where the hydrogen is produced by wind power or other renewable energy sources, the environmental impact is almost zero.

These considerations are behind an ongoing venture by the Sotavento Virtual Power Plant in Galicia, Spain, which was designed by Gas Natural SDG, Spain’s largest energy company, in conjunction with the Galician Regional Government (Xunta) and the Sotavento Foundation. In essence, a virtual power plant is a group of distributed power generation installations operated collectively by a central control unit.

The project goals for Sotavento are to assess the suitability of hydrogen as a storable form of energy in its gas state. The company’s objectives include:
 Commercial green energy production;
 Demonstration of the various wind technologies present in Galicia;
 Establishment of an education and training centre;
 Establishment of a conference centre for related events; and
 General promotion of renewable energy.

To do this effectively, however, integration of the control systems used to operate the various power generation units at Sotavento has to take place.

The system integration hurdle
For large enterprises like power plants and water treatment facilities, it is common for myriad disparate control systems to be in operation. In most cases, the control equipment—sourced from different vendors, each with its own area of expertise—is often composed of a programmable logic controller capable of operating a particular piece of equipment, but with little additional functionality. The operator interface to these controllers is typically some form of a local display panel with some or no connectivity to the rest of the enterprise.

To address Sotavento’s multiple control system issues, Gas Natural contracted systems integrator Optomation Systems to design an integrated supervisory system for the Sotavento site. The system is based on the Opto 22 Snap PAC System platform (see sidebar box).

In consultation with Gas Natural, Optomation concluded that Sotavento’s system would need to:
 Serve as a common manageable platform for process monitoring, data acquisition, and auxiliary control;
 Provide complete supervision of electrolysers, compressors, and hydrogen motor-generator units via a common operator interface;
 Access and integrate data from the wind generator’s existing SCADA system;
 Provide level and temperature monitoring in the hydrogen storage area (which is classified as explosive);
 Enable remote monitoring of the installation, along with remote stop/start/shutdown capability over a secure Internet connection;
 Provide data storage in a commercial relational database; and
 Export production data via the Internet.
Employing a mix of analogue and digital I/O connections, Optomation used Snap PAC stand-alone and rack-mounted PACs to connect the electrolysers, motor generator units, and other plant equipment and, as required, communicate with this equipment directly or via interface with other SCADA systems (see graphic).

Across the Sotavento sites, disparate machinery, systems, and instrumentation from vendors such as Hydrogenics, Emerson, and Bauer Compressors are all linked to the Opto 22 controllers, which communicate to each subsystem or machine using the same protocol originally specified by the manufacturer. Specifically, these protocols include Profibus, for control and acquisition of production data from the electrolyser units, and Modbus for control and acquisition of production data from the compressors. There is also an RS-232 serial link to the motor-generator units for taking analogue measurements and digital readings. The Snap PAC controllers aggregate all data and serve it to a Sotavento database that’s accessible to select personnel via a secure Internet connection.

Protocols and integrator expertise
“The secret to successful implementation of projects like this rests in defining the protocols at the hardware purchase stage, well before writing the first line of code,” said Fabio Alberini, one of Optomation Systems’ project managers on the Sotavento project. “If the customer fully understands and insists on the importance of data integration, suppliers will be obliged to include the necessary hardware interfaces and software support as part of their deliverables. Conversely, trying to design the communication links after the equipment is chosen and installed is more difficult, costly, and beyond the core competencies of the supplier.”

Alberini advises control system purchasers to “understand what communications options are possible and always try to standardise on protocols.” He maintains that there is still no better standard than Modbus for moving data between industrial devices. “It requires no special hardware or software interfaces,” he says, “and it’s royalty free and easy to implement. At the Ethernet level, Modbus/TCP is an even better alternative.”

When hiring a system integrator, Alberini recommends ensuring that they have experience writing software for the hardware platform being used, as well as expertise integrating data.

Print this page | E-mail this page