Proximity sensing choices
28 August 2012
There is a wide selection of industrial proximity sensors on the market today, so how do you choose the best type for your application? Stuart Greenwood of Eaton’s Electrical Sector provides some guidance.
When choosing a proximity sensor, the first decision – whether to use an inductive or a capacitive type – is also one of the most important, but in most cases is one of the easiest too. The fundamental difference is that inductive sensors detect only metallic targets, whereas capacitive sensors detect both metallic and non-metallic targets. In addition, capacitive sensors often have a greater sensing range for a given size of sensor.
This may make it sound as if capacitive sensors could be used in almost any application, but it is not quite that simple. It is virtually impossible to shield capacitive sensors, so they are not suitable for flush mounting and, when multiple sensors are used, they must be spaced further apart than inductive sensors. Capacitive sensors are also more sensitive to RFI than inductive types and their ability to detect almost anything can sometimes be a disadvantage rather than a benefit. In areas where the humidity is high, for example, a capacitive sensor can be triggered by water vapour in the air, even if no target is present.
However, capacitive sensors do have their uses. They are suitable for detecting liquids and powders and are often used for level control in tanks and hoppers. Unless the ability of capacitive sensors to respond to non-metallic targets is needed, however, it is almost always better to choose an inductive sensor.
A variety of types and sizes
That is not the end of the story, as inductive sensors are offered in a wide variety of sizes and types. The basic physical formats are cylindrical, often with threaded bodies, or rectangular. Cylindrical sensors are popular, as they are easy to install and, particularly with threaded body types, accurate adjustment of the mounting position is easy. They are available in standard and short-body versions, and most manufacturers offer units with stainless-steel bodies, which are suitable for food and pharmaceutical applications.
Rectangular sensors, however, are less likely to be displaced by impacts in, for example, mechanical handling systems and the larger versions have a longer operating range than can usually be provided by cylindrical-body sensors. They are often chosen for ‘heavy-duty’ applications. Current models of both cylindrical and rectangular sensors will almost certainly have ingress protection (IP) ratings of IP67 or better, which means they can be used in wet and dirty conditions, and will be unaffected by washdown cleaning operations.
Because of the popularity of cylindrical inductive proximity sensors, they are offered in a bewildering array of types, which can make it hard to decide on the best unit for a specific application. The decision process has been made less difficult by the recent appearance on the market of intelligent proximity sensors which can be configured to specific requirements.
DC versions of these intelligent sensors can automatically detect whether NPN or PNP output operation is needed, and set themselves accordingly. They can also be expected to offer an extended sensing range that is more than twice that of a standard sensor with the same body size. The best models can go much further by incorporating embedded microprocessors to allow a level of customisation that has never previously been possible.
Users can, for example, switch the sensors between normally open and normally closed operation, and they can not only adjust the sensing range precisely, but also set sensing bands anywhere within the sensing range. The sensor responds only when the target is within this band – if it is closer or further way, it is not detected. This feature can be used to ensure accurate positioning of a target, and is also invaluable for ignoring the influence of metallic objects closer to the sensor than the target.
These sensors even incorporate user-adjustable time delays and speed detection logic that can be turned on or off as required. This means that, in many applications, the need for an external timer or speed relay is eliminated, saving money, space and installation time.
In conclusion, although there is a huge variety of proximity sensors on offer choosing the right one for an application needn’t be too much of a challenge. Inductive rather than capacitive types are right for most applications, and choosing the right inductive sensor has now been made easier by the introduction of intelligent types, which can be configured to work exactly as you want.
Contact Details and Archive...
Most Viewed Articles...