Bit by bit: Why use serial communications?
29 January 2009
In this day and age, why use serial communications, such as RS-232, RS-422, and RS-485? Digital industrial networks, fieldbuses, device- and sensor- level networks (also USB) all support many vendors’ products and can offer advanced features for configuration and diagnostics.
Hybrid communication modules, such as the Moor Industries International microNCS, include serial (Modbus-RTU and RS-485), Ethernet, and I/O connections
So why use serial? Answers are low cost, simplicity, and familiarity. Industrial serial communications, largely RS-232, RS-422, and RS-485, are still included on many products and machines because they provide simple, bit-level, point-to-point communications, and they are widely understood.
Serial communication still exists, says Jim Toepper, product manager for the connectivity group of Moxa Americas, because:
It remains an easy and inexpensive way to communicate with devices. Most vendors will offer a serial-only version as an entry-level product, offering an Ethernet-enabled version as a higher end offering;
If a product has been in production for many years and is proven, it could be cost- prohibitive for a device manufacturer to redesign and recertify an Ethernet (or other network-enabled) version of the same product. While Ethernet components themselves are not that much more expensive than serial components, implementation and design of Ethernet can be costly. “In some cases it is actually less expensive to buy an entry-level serial sensor or flowmeter and attach it to a serial-to-Ethernet converter to get your devices on the network,” he says.
In some cases, devices are coupled with a controller or data logger, sometimes in the same vicinity, thus negating the need for Ethernet. If the controller is central, and signals travel up to 4,000 ft, current loop RS-422 or RS-485 is preferred over Ethernet for flowmeters, temperature sensors, and similar devices. Many such devices use 4-20 mA, digital current loop, and Modbus over serial. Modbus can add some intelligence with timeouts and other capabilities.
‘Serial can be the least expensive and simple solution when your communication is point to point,’ Toepper says. Wider data sharing with other systems, or taking advantage of existing Ethernet, may call for a shift from serial devices or using a cost effective means of translation, he adds.
However, because serial communication transmits a bit of data at a time, it’s often not enough for many of today’s needs. High profitability and efficiency requires that the network: control the process; monitor the process, the communications efficiencies, and the calibrations of the process control sensors/actuators; catch alarms and trends; and then use that information to tweak the system for optimum performance, says Jim McConahay, senior field applications engineer for Moore Industries International Inc.
‘We now realise that legacy protocols used on twisted pair cables are not able to accomplish this increased workload performance needed for maximum profitability/efficiency. There is just too much to do via traditional twisted pair, digital communications protocols,’ McConahay says.
‘Serial protocols are excellent for data transfer,’ McConahay adds, ‘but do not conveniently enable increased information and control flexibilities.’
Mark T. Hoske, editor in chief at Control Engineering
Contact Details and Archive...
Most Viewed Articles...